Hamilton Zephyrhawke Trial Consulting

Hamilton Zephyrhawke Trial Consulting

We are experts in change of venue surveys and the analysis of publicity’s impact in high pretrial publicity cases.

 

Hamilton Zephyrhawke Trial Consulting is a specialized legal consulting firm

We can improve your chances of winning your case through our skills in change of venue surveys, voir dire questioning, jury questionnaires and pretrial publicity analysis. Dr. Mykol Hamilton is a professor, Kate Zephyrhawke is a retired professor, and both are active scholarly researchers in the field of legal psychology. See our publications and presentations below. Hamilton is also consulted frequently by the media.

Professional Services Offered By Hamilton Zephyrhawke Trail Consulting

Change of venue surveys

jury surveys

Voir dire consulting

pretrial publicity analysis

Mykol C. Hamilton, PhD

Stanford University BA Psychology
San Jose State University MA Social Science
UCLA MA, PhD Social Psychology

I have a 40-year background in the principles of social psychology, which is where most of the theory and practice of trial consulting comes from. I’ve been a professor since 1985, teaching social psychology, experimental methods, statistics, psychology of law, and other relevant courses. I have published articles on how to get honest answers about bias in voir dire and in surveys. I am uniquely qualified to perform surveys about juror bias, therefore.

Experience

  • 17 years trial consulting experience.  Performed 20 COV surveys and pretrial publicity content analyses. Experience in mock trials, jury selection/voir dire, Colorado Method of juror life qualification.
  • Critiqued change of venue surveys performed by other trial consulting companies, testified in court about errors in their question construction, the statistical analyses they used, and their interpretations of results.
  • Scholarly research on legal psychology issues. For example, on “prehabilitation” (a term coined in Hamilton’s research lab), which refers to judges’ and attorneys’ attempts to rehabilitate before asking prospective jurors about their biases, thereby exerting pressure on them to hide any biases from the court.
    Examples:
    “We’re here to see whether you are able to set aside pretrial publicity.” “Do you think you are capable of being impartial and fair?”
    “Remember, it is your duty to presume innocence. Do you think you can do that?”
  • Taught CLE courses concerning voir dire and change of venue.
  • Psychology professor since 1985. Courses:  Law and Human Behavior, Statistics, Social Psychology, Experimental Methods, Applied Psychology, Introduction to Psychology, Psychology of Women, Advanced Research.
  • Member: American Society of Trial Consultants, former Director of Research, currently on the Peremptory Challenges Task Force.

Experience

  • Survey question composition and change of venue survey reports.
  • Scholarly research on legal psychology issues.

Kate Zephyrhawke

UC Berkeley BA English Literature
University of South Florida MA Rhetoric and Composition
Institute of Transpersonal Psychology MA Psychology
San Jose State University (ABT) MA Mass Communications

Presentations & Publications

  • Salerno, J.M., Hamilton, M.C., & Breitenstein, M., & Zagnoli, T. (2022, June). Using Expanded Voir Dire to Identify Bias. Presentation at the American Society of Trial Consultants Conference, Denver, CO.
  • Ellis, L., Gabriel, R., Hamilton, M.C., Morris, C. (2022, June). Peremptory Task Force Progress Report. American Society of Trial Consultants Conference, Denver, CO.
  • Hamilton, M.C., Marder, N., & Peery, D. (2017, June). Debate on the Elimination of Peremptory Challenges. Invited speaker, American Society of Trial Consultants Conference, Chicago, IL.
  • Hamilton, M.C., Olson, B., Sackett, C., & Seago, E. (2017, June). Legal Authoritarianism and Need for Cognition Questions as Predictors of Guilty and Death Penalty Biases. Poster and oral presentation at the American Society of Trial Consultants Conference, Chicago, IL.
  • Hamilton, M.C. (2017, August). Uncovering Jury Bias by Asking the Right Questions: The Social Psychology of Jury Selection. Continuing Legal Education Workshop, Kentucky Bar Association, Lexington, KY.
  • Hamilton, M. C., & Zephyrhawke, K.  (2015, December). Revealing Juror Bias without Biasing Your Juror: Experimental Evidence for best Practice Survey and Voir Dire Questions. The Jury Expert27(4). 
  • Hamilton, M.C., Linden, E., Moore, H., Pitt, M., & Storch, L. (2014). The Ubiquity of Premature Rehabilitation: How “Prehabilitation” Leads Prospective Jurors to Hide Their Biases, The Jury Expert26(3).
  • Hamilton, M.C., Moore, E. (2014, June). The Prevalence of “Prehabilitation” in Voir Dire: How Judges and Attorneys Inadvertently Lead Prospective Jurors to Hide Their Biases. Poster presented at the conference of the American Society of Trial Consultants, Asheville, NC. First place in Poster Competition.
  • Hamilton, M. C. (2014, March). Detecting Juror Bias in High PTP Cases. CLE Symposium, Fayette County Bar Association, Lexington, KY.
  • Hamilton, M. C., Henize, H., Phipps, C., & Storch, L.  (2013, May). Voir Dire and Social Desirability: Does “Prehabilitation” Reveal or Conceal Juror Bias?  Presented at the American Psychological Science Conference, Washington, D. C.
  • Hamilton, M. C., & Henize, H. (2013, February).  Prehabilitation, Individual Voir Dire, and Detecting Prospective Juror Bias: The Trayvon Martin Case.  Presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference, Portland, OR.
  • Robbins, E., Stivers, K., & Hamilton, M. C. (2012, November). Judicial Practices, Hidden Juror Bias, and the Trayvon Martin Case: Better Practices in Individual Voir Dire. Paper presented at the Kentucky Academy of Science Conference, Frankfort, KY.  First place, Psychology Papers Competition.
  • Hamilton, M. C., & Lunger, J. (2012). The Dangers of Pretrial Publicity: How a Change of Venue Survey Can Help.  Continuing Legal Education Symposium, Kentucky Bar Association Convention, Louisville.
  • Hamilton, M., Augustus, A. N., & Melloan, J. (2011, March). Voir Dire, Change of Venue, and “Legal Desirability”: Hidden Jury Bias in High PTP Cases. Presented at the American Psychology-Law Society International Conference, Miami, FL.
  • Siler, H., & Hamilton, M. C. (2010, April). The Role of Context and Wording in Prospective Juror Questioning. Presented at the Southwestern Psychological Association Conference, Dallas, TX.
  • Hamilton, M. C., & Poe, L. (2010, April). Weapon Focus: Threat or Unusualness? Presented at RICE Conference, Centre College.
  • Hamilton, M. C., & McGinley, K. (2009, March). Lies, Damn Lies, and Voir Dire: Prospective Jurors’ Opinions of Guilt/Innocence in Highly Publicized Cases. Presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference, San Antonio, TX.
  • Hamilton, M.C., Hunter, B., & Stuart-Smith, S. (1994).  Jury instructions Worded in the Masculine Generic: Can a Woman Claim Self-defense When “He” is Threatened?  In C. Roman, S.Juhasz, & C. Miller. The woman and language debate: A sourcebook. New Brunswick, N.J.:  Rutgers University Press.      
  • Hamilton, M.C. (1994, March). Does Male-biased Language in a State Constitution Really Hurt?  Presented at the Association for Women in Psychology, Newport, RI.
  • Hamilton, M.C. (1988, November). Masculine Generics in Jury Instructions. Presented at the Kentucky Academy of Science, Richmond, KY.

Email

mykol.hamilton@centre.edu

Hours

9AM to 9PM EST

Location

Centre College
600 W Walnut St.
Danville, KY 40422
United States